WebUnited States v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 164, 168 (D.D.C. 2011). “The general purpose of a motion for clarification is to explain or clarify something ambiguous or vague, not to alter or amend.” Id. “Although such a motion cannot open the door to ‘re-litigat[ing] a matter that the court has considered and decided,’ Sai v. WebDec 25, 2024 · Betty Bullock was the Plaintiff in case of Bullock v. Philip Morris. Bullock started smoking in the 1950s at age 17 and was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2001. …
JODIE BULLOCK v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC (2011) FindLaw
WebAug 15, 2011 · In 2001, Bullock filed suit against Philip Morris. Bullock sought to recover damages for personal injuries based on products liability, fraud and other theories. WebOct 4, 2002 · Bullock's lawyer, Michael Piuze, argued that Philip Morris concealed the dangers of cigarettes. He managed to make out a case of fraud despite a recent … olivia hussey tv shows
Bullock V. Philip Morris Usa, Inc.: Where ‘Reprehensibility
WebAug 17, 2011 · Betty Bullock smoked cigarettes manufactured by Philip Morris for 45 years from 1956, when she was 17 years old, until she was diagnosed with lung cancer … WebAug 19, 2011 · In Bullock v. Philip Morris. In almost every instance, punitive damages cannot exceed compensatory damages by more than a single digit ratio, the Supreme Court declared in State Farm Mut. WebAug 27, 2009 · The case, Bullock v. Philip Morris USA Inc., BC249171, Superior Court of California (Los Angeles County), ended with the parent company of Philip Morris USA, Altria, ordered to pay millions to the plaintiff, Jodie Bullock. Lawyers representing Jodie Bullock, the daughter of now deceased smoker, Betty Bullock, finally claimed victory … olivia hussey romeo and juliet scene